LinkedIn’s new universal apply button

Well, I don’t quite know where to start with this one! 

 I totally understand that this is a natural progression in the evolution of the myriad of  job boards, and no doubt soon Linked in will add a cost factor to all participating.

Don’t get me wrong, I like and use Linked In as many millions of others do, and it is great way to stay up to date with all your connections that way.

I shake my head at this however…. As  company do you really want all your openings blasted out to cyberspace for all to see? And how about the extra zillion or so unsuitable resumes clogging your automated data systems that you’ll have to manage somehow?

As as a candidate -  do you really want to apply knowing that you’re just another one of those zillions applying to the position that you feel you might be just perfect for?  An automated system deciding if you should be flagged for a human look? Talk about the chances of winning a lottery…

I don’t care how sophisticated  software systems can become -  no automated process of gathering names and parsing them will EVER be more efficient that a good old fashion caring career matchmaker.

At first glance, it all sounds well and dandy for a company to have  the equivalent of the New York City telephone book at their finger tips for each position they may need filled, but really, so what? Having that list is just the start….it does not ensure that you put the perfect person in the position.

Talk about the proverbial finding a needle in the haystack -  well the needle  - that’s you, the candidate by the way -  just got way smaller, and the haystack just grew to the size of the Empire State building!

I personally don’t post ads on the job boards and never have for that very reason -  my candidates prefer working with someone that they can trust to help them to advance their career, that can be an advocate and a sage for them. My clients  want results  -  the best people presented to them for the position in the shortest period of time possible. They do not want to waste time, money or take the chance that a chosen applicant  will not work out. 

While my “telephone book” has become quite large over the past twenty or so years, the difference is we KNOW the people in that book, and we care about them and their careers. 

Nope -  I believe that skillful career matchmaking trumps database searching every time -  including this new LI feature.

Linked In Introduces Universal Resume Apply Button byJohn Zappe    Jul 25, 2011, 12:55 pm ET

Just before lunchtime in New York City, LinkedIn announced it is offering employers a button to include on all their job postings enabling candidates to use their LinkedIn profiles to apply for the position.

This “Apply With LinkedIn” featurewraps up the candidate profile in a tidy package that feeds directly into any one of the several tracking systems it has or will partner with. No ATS? No problem. LinkedIn will email the profile to you.

This portable feature can be used on any job, anywhere, on any site, including any job board.

Five ATS providers — Peoplefluent, Jobvite, SmartRecruiters, Bullhorn, and Jobscience — turned on the automatic feature this morning. Taleo, Lumesse, and Kenexa will have it enabled in a matter of months.

However, as LinkedIn’s VP of product management, Adam Nash, explained, the company designed the “apply” feature to be used by small, as well as large employers. It’s “really trivial” for a hiring manager at even the smallest of firms to add the button to a job posting, and specify how and where the resume is to be received.

Even candidates with resumes already on file with a job board may find the LinkedIn apply feature of more use, since it allows them to update their LinkedIn profile before submitting it, and also tells them who in their network works or knows someone at the company.

Those who click the link without having a profile — a not-too-common occurrence given the 100 million members LinkedIn has — will be given an opportunity to join.

Candidates can always opt to use some other source for their resume submission, Nash said. “This won’t be the only option there,” he said. If, though, recruiters begin to use the “apply” button in numbers, job seekers will find it easier to keep one profile updated, than the 12.6 LinkedIn says the average seeker has.

“Users,” he added, “will vote with their clicks.”

Its one major drawback is that it doesn’t yet work with smartphones. It will with some portable devices such as an iPad. Full mobile compatibility is coming, Nash promised.

 “Apply With LinkedIn” has very definite consequences for job boards, which derive a third or more of their revenue from resume searching. Almost two months ago Dan Schawbel wrote about the feature, still then under wraps. Touting the advantages of the plug-in, he said, “Job boards and traditional resumes are going to fade faster than I even predicted!”

This morning, I emailed three of the largest job boards for their reaction. I haven’t yet heard from any of them,  but I can’t imagine this is a development they’re welcoming. Corporate career sites, search engines, and social media all have impacted the pay-to-post business of job boards. Now LinkedIn is making a frontal assault on resume search.

Earlier this month, it shut down access to its networkfor sites like Monster’s BeKnown and BranchOut. Those services leveraged information on social networks, including LinkedIn’s, to build profiles for their members. Now, in a bit of a turnabout, LinkedIn hopes to leverage job postings to increase its own recruitment value. Whether it succeeds will depend on convincing recruiters and employers to adopt the plug-in and use it on every job posting. Netflix, LivingSocial, and Photobucket are among the initial users.

“Like everything transformative, you can argue both sides of the equation,” Nash said, when I asked him what reception LinkedIn expected from the job boards.

In the last three years especially, LinkedIn has been encroaching ever more aggressively into job board territory, offering premium search tools for recruiters,  job postings, experimenting with career tools, adding a resume-maker for candidates, and now the apply button.

There’s no mystery why LinkedIn is transforming its business network into whatGerry Crispin called a “job board for the 21st century.”In 2010, recruitment products accounted for 42 percent of LinkedIn’s total revenue. In 2008, it was 22 percent, third behind marketing solutions and premium subscriptions.

tags: jobboards, social media

  • Email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Business networking, Food for thought, General Info, HR topics, Managers, Networking, Recruiter, Staffing, social media | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Employers – How to start an employee relationship on the wrong foot!

Extending Job Offers Too Late

You know, in the “olden days” ( yes, I was there…) the process of interviewing and deciding on an applicant for a position was a mutually respectful process -  a bit like going on the first few dates with someone. You cared what they thought, and tried hard to impress -  even though you hadn’t made up your own mind as yet, still, you wanted to leave a good  impression…

Over the years as the hiring process has become more impersonal with candidates forced to apply and be screened via computer applications, automated interviews and telephone screenings, I think we have all lost something in the process -  the humanity and respect for one another – people have somehow become a commodity, a widget to be utilized as needed. 

This article is very well written and I think captures the feeling that every person  has as they get to the end of the interview process for a job.  As a veteran recruiter , I share their frustrations and their conclusions as I also have struggled  at times to get the client to actually ”close the sale”

I can’t really put my finger on why many Company decision makers start to procrastinate when they get to this stage of the process -  but I really like the writers analogy about the waiter -  as  they really do do damage to the impression and their reputation that they have originally established in that candidates mind. And that starts to create that little gnawing black feeling of doubt about the opportunity and the company in general. (Retailers : remember -  candidates are customers too!!)

 Timothy does a great job of articulating the things that run through the candidates mind - I hear the exact same comments from finalist candidates all the time. Fortunately, they have me at their side as their Career Matchmaker working as their advocate in the hiring process. Pity the candidate who has applied on their own, as they sit in the dark musing  and fuming on the reasons why the call is not coming that can potentially change their whole life.

It’s just not a good way to start a relationship with a new employee!!!  If that good looking date treats you badly at some point in the dating ritual, you tend not to forget that too quickly -  even if you agree to continue seeing them. It’s lodged somewhere in the back of your mind, something to be on the lookout for again… a flaw….

 And, it’s all so darn avoidable….Be sure of what you want in a new employee and why you want them before you start the interview process. And when you feel that you’ve found the right person , get on with it!  Golden rule here people -  treat your candidate as you would like to be treated if you were in their shoes! ( after all,  you just never know when that might be!!)

Thanks for reading!

Elaine

With the demand for technical talent these days I wonder why, after completing many rounds of interviews and deciding to hire a candidate, it takes more than three days to come out with an offer. Why wait? You lose momentum from the last interview with every minute that goes by. Take advantage of the moment and make the offer you intend to make within 24 hours of the candidate’s final interview. Otherwise you run the risk of stunting the momentum you’ve worked so hard to create and souring the experience for the job seeker.

Everyone has been in this situation: you go to a restaurant, you have a great meal, the experience and vibe of the place is amazing and the wait staff is very friendly, timely and informative. Then you finish your meal and your cocktail and you wonder where that wonderful waiter went. It’s obvious that the server is busy with other tables, but all they need to do is get the check for you and you’ll be out the door! As time goes on, the great dining experience you had turns sour and while it won’t completely ruin the experience it will stick in your mind and be the last thing you remember about the place. All that hard work the server put in at the beginning is forgotten and his tip will, no doubt, be drastically reduced.

Similarly, while the job seeker reflects on the interviewing experience and wonders why it’s taking so long to make a decision, they start resenting how long they’re being made to wait. Put yourself in the shoes of a job seeker after a final round interview. Imagine that you felt it went very well and maybe the hiring manager even said that they will be getting back to you shortly with an offer or a positive decision. A day passes, then two days, then the weekend.

Here’s the job seeker’s thought process:

* They’re interviewing other candidates so I should check out other options to see if there’s anything better out there.

* Did I say something that put them off in the final interview? It wasn’t a technical interview so maybe they just didn’t like me and were putting on a fake façade.

* I have an offer already from my #2 choice. Since my #1 choice is taking so long I had better accept the offer from my #2. After all, a bird in hand is better than two in the bush!

* If they take this long to make a decision, how do they make other decisions?

* Do I want to work for someone that can’t make up their mind?

Ultimately you can see that letting a candidate sit for too long is not a good thing. Job seekers are not wine or cheese! They’re people who want to be hired. I understand that larger companies have processes in place for a reason and an approval strategy must be gone through before any offers are extended, but you can get all of that done before the final round interview. You can get ready to go so you can make a timely decision.

Here are some other tips:

* Make a verbal offer and let the job seeker know that once you get verbal acceptance you will generate the offer letter.

* Alert your hiring “party” that you have a candidate that you’re strongly considering, in order to get the necessary paperwork out of the way before the final round interview.

* If you’re working with an agency make sure that they set the proper expectations with the job seeker ahead of time so it doesn’t become a frustrating “hurry up and wait” scenario.

* Follow up with the job seeker every day to update them on what’s happening. The worst thing you can do is let the job seeker simmer without any updates.

In a perfect world you’d find a job seeker that you want to hire and you’d make them an offer. There are certain procedures for doing things that you must adhere to but don’t let them stand in the way of hiring the right candidate. The market is, once again, incredibly competitive for good candidates and sometimes the only thing that keeps you from getting the candidate you want is the slowness of your hiring process.

Full speed ahead!

  • Email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Business networking, General Info, HR topics, Managers, Recruiter, Retail sales, Staffing | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

You can’t be passive on on Recruitment any more!(That is if you want to hire a great employee!!)

This recent article from NetHire lays out the stats quite plainly… companies are now hiring, and there are lots of people looking -  but matching the perfect employee to the job is much more tricky than posting an ad!

Whether you are overwhelmed with applications of non suitable candidates, or you just can’t attract the calibre and personality you need, time is money, and vacancies lose money…. Save both your time and your money by reaching  out to your Career Matchmaker ( you know  – she’s the one who knows all the great people!) to get to the perfect people for your needs!

E

Skills shortage wreaking havoc on employers

Employment comic cartoon

The Canadian unemployment rate is at a two-year low and there are thousands of jobs advertised everyday in newspapers and websites across Canada. The pace of hiring is expected to increase yet again for the second half of 2011 with Career Builder reporting that 61% of companies plan to hire during this time. So why are many Canadians still complaining that there is a lack of employment opportunities available? For those in-the-know that is an easy question to answer: there is not a shortage of labour, but a shortage of labour skilled in the areas that are in-demand. 

Skilled labour demand in the areas of IT; health care; oil and gas; mining and trades is not expected to slow. In fact, it will prove to be detrimental to the growth of these industries in the coming years as they struggle to find employees with the skills their positions require. 

As demand for employees increases so does turnover of skilled employees. Companies are increasing competition and are enticing employed skilled individuals to move over to their organizations by offering large compensation and benefit packages. It will become more important over the coming months and years, as full employment for individuals with in-demand skills comes to fruition, for companies to have in place policies and employee support systems that encourage employee retention. 

That is not to say that all industries are experiencing these shortfalls, or that all job seekers will benefit from this demand. In the past ten years the economy has rapidly changed, outsourcing of many positions that were primarily catered to by new immigrants and unskilled workers have been outsourced to countries with cheaper labour. 

New immigrants continue to come to Canada in search of better employment opportunities, loaded with their education and experience in health care, engineering and skilled trades. Yet their credentials are not recognized as equivalent, their language and social skills continue to lack behind and inhibit their chances of attaining gainful and productive employment in their chosen fields. As a result they are less likely to benefit from the demand for skilled labour. 

NetHire recently posted an advertisement for an entry-level receptionist and in 4 days was bombarded with close to 400 resumes, all the while searches for skilled oil field engineers and miners receive an average of 30 resumes in 30 days. These numbers show just how different the skills differential is, and how the gap between the educated and skilled is growing in comparison to positions that require no post-secondary education or technical skills.

Recruitment is only going to get harder for employers in need of skilled workers and it is up to HR professionals, business owners and recruiters to look to other sources of recruitment to reach the passive job seeker if they are to be competitive in the hunt for skilled labour.

  • Email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Managers, Recruiter, Retail sales, Staffing | 2 Comments

Are you watching your back door???

 Good Morning!!    While Mr Wheeler is writing about employment stats in the US as the economy improves, the main points of his message ring uncomfortably true here in Canada as well….In speaking to many of the people in our candidate network over the past several months,  pay issues, work load expectation, lack of empathy for employee needs are frequent reasons given as to why they have asked us to start a new job search for them.

So here’s my take -  and I think it’s a really good tip for employers….it’s like a marriage -  if you spend all your energy on the courtship, then proceed to treat her poorly ( or worse –  ignore her needs) after the wedding, it will certainly end in tears…. ( sorry, it’s the Career Matchmaker in me talking!!)

Honestly, it’s hard enough to attract top talent into an organization, but I believe that the need to do that would be greatly reduced, (and they’d have a much more productive team!) if companies would just spend as much time and resources making sure that they do everything they can to develop devoted employees and inprove their retention rates….I am not really sure why many ( most!) do not get that…..

Am I right??? So…why do companies do this??

The Door Is Opening and People Are Leaving , byKevin Wheeler

There is going to be an exodus of workers soon from businesses all across the U.S. It seems that for all the work recruiters do at the front end, organizations are undoing it at the backend. Frustrated employees are seeking new opportunities in record numbers, but if you are prepared, your talent shortages may be over.

Earlier this week, Mercer released its What’s Working survey that found that “one in two U.S. employees [are] looking to leave or [have] checked out on the job.” Other surveys support these findings, including ones by Right Management.

Is this simply the grass-is-greener syndrome, or is there something else going on? Even though there are plenty of jobs for certain types of people — Amazon is adding 5,000 people, and McDonald’s, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and Apple are just a few others that have announced fairly large hiring plans — we are not actually out of this recession, and changing jobs is a risky business.

While money and benefits are not the primary reason people leave their employers in normal times, these times are very different.

This recession has lingered longer than most and is impacting a generation of workers who have not suffered much from recessions in the past. Their tolerance is different, and so are their expectations.

Today I think there are four primary drivers of these rather frightening statistics. And these same reasons will eventually drive away the new people you recruit as well, unless you are candid and realistic right up front with the candidates.

The first driver is actually pay this time. For many employees it has been a long time since they have gotten much in the way of a pay increase. The recession is often used as a reason for not granting reasonable increases, and managers have been more focused on performance — of lack of performance as a way to hold down these increases.

Yet, employees see their organizations making good profits and in some cases even record profits. Corporate coffers are flush with cash, yet this has not translated into significant pay increases. At the same time, option grants have shrunk due to changes in how they are taxed, giving some employees even less reason to stay.

Employees perceive a unfairness in how they are paid compared to how firms are profiting.

Second, and not completely separated from pay, is the amount of work that is being asked of employees. Many people I speak with are really doing what two or more would have done prior to this recession. Managers have asked for more and gotten it as employees fear there are few other jobs.

Yet the perception about jobs is changing, and many are starting to make a move if for no other reason than to lessen their workload or find a more flexible employer.

A third growing issue is the attitude younger workers, especially those in the Gen Y category, have about work. They feel their personal freedom is threatened by restrictive social media polices. And they are unhappy with the unwillingness of many firms to allow flexible working hours. They are also inclined to want open, authentic cultures and this recession has caused firms to tighten up communications, keep more secrets, and allow much less open discussion. This is all negative to the younger folks who will seek out more open and flexible environments.

A fourth element is lack of development. Many surveys have pointed out that Gen Y in particular, but all of us at some time, want to take on new responsibilities and learn new skills. During the recession organizations cut back on training and limited development opportunities. In some cases when development was available no one could take advantage oif it because of high-demand work requirements that left no time available. This has resulted in frustrated and bored employees who are looking for a change.

In reality, it’s not hard to see why these surveys are showing a potentially devastating amount of turnover about to happen.

I also realize that while there may not be a lot you can do about these things; there are always creative tactics that can help. Here are some thoughts.

First of all, make internal mobility the most important thing you focus on. Helping employees find new positions may be the best and most direct way you can influence them to stay. Yet, most organizations either erect numerous bureaucratic hurdles that make moving around tough, or they simply do not offer any simple way for an employee to learn about possibilities.

The intranet or some other internal website should be designed so that employees can learn about open positions and can apply for those positions. Work with HR to take down barriers and make it as easy to move between positions as it is to move outside the firm. This probably means that many current practices will have to change. Organizations with low turnover generally follow several rules that guide the internal application and transfer process.

  1. Employees should be able to interview for new positions without permission from anyone.
  2. They should not have to complete any sort of application form, and resumes should be very simple, if used at all.
  3. They should be able to leave their current position within a maximum of two weeks after accepting another offer — even if their old position has not been filled.
  4. Salaries offered should be similar to those an external hire would receive.

Second, help hiring managers reposition jobs to match the available skills rather than seek out only those who are perfect fits.

Don’t go for the exact match. Encourage hiring managers to be more open to giving internal candidates an opportunity. Exact matching is expensive and pays little in return. No one is good enough at predicting what the exact set of skills are going to be for every project and job. Hiring internal people with basic qualifications is often the better decision as these people not only bring enthusiasm and freshness, but also fit the culture. Recruiters need to encourage managers to experiment and realize that most of us are not doing the exact job we were trained to do or even the work our degrees prepared us for.

And, finally, be open with potential candidates about what’s going on in the company.

When you set realistic expectations up front, you lessen the disillusionment that will come after the new hire starts. Strive for authenticity. Encourage them to talk to employees who are happy and engaged. Make sure candidates are good culture fits and that they are fully informed about the work they are going to be expected to do.

Working with the hiring managers is key to success, as talent shortages are partly caused by lack of imagination. Jobs can be tailored to fit candidates, job descriptions can be changed, and managers can be flexible. It takes negotiating with them and providing them information about what’s going on. Turnover may happen, but you may be able to lessen its impact or bring in new people better fitted to your culture.

Check us out on www.retailcareers.com

  • Email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Business networking, HR topics, Managers, Recruiter, Staffing | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

You resign!!! So your boss begs, pleads, and then…. throws you that big carrot that’s so hard to say no to: OH! the perils of the Counter offer

Here’s another great article about the realities of taking a counteroffer – well written, and from the heart of another Exec recruiter! I totally agree - and  believe me, more often than not it is a very short lived victory….Take note!!

Commentary
Receive A Job Counter-Offer? Don’t Take It
 A few years ago, I recruited an executive to run a mid-level company. The night before he was supposed to start his new job, the executive called to say he was staying put. The board of directors at his current company–a major multinational retailer–had offered to name him CEO in one year’s time.

 I was aghast, but my former candidate could hardly envision a better scenario. He had leveraged an offer to run a mid-sized company and used it to land the coveted top spot at a retailing giant. No greater career coup exists, right?

Wrong.

 After three tumultuous years as CEO, my former candidate was fired. This executive was not yet ready to run such a large organization. Had he accepted the job at the smaller company, he could have gained the necessary experience to successfully run a major multinational in due time.

 Instead, he lured his company into a bidding war and forced the board to make a rash decision about retention in the name of corporate competition. As a result, his career ultimately suffered a mortal blow, not to mention the damage he caused shareholders, who watched their stock drop as a result of his inexperience.

 Unable to land another CEO position, he took an early retirement.

 In my 25 years of experience, I have learned that accepting a counter-offer is usually career suicide. Watching your boss scramble to keep you may be a heady experience, but in exchange for that sweet moment, you’ll have squandered your honor, a sacrifice that will haunt you for many years. Even more troubling, you may never know exactly when or to what extent your reputation has been sullied.

 There’s a good chance hiring executives might blacklist you from other employment opportunities. Aside from refusing to ever hire you again, executives have long memories and will bad mouth you any chance they get.

 I remember sitting on a plane with a group of retail executives when someone mentioned, by name, a seasoned retailer. The group listened intently as one of the executives launched into an unflattering tale of how the employee had used the executive’s perfectly good job offer as a bargaining chip for a fat buyback. By being dishonest with one company, the employee harmed his reputation with all of the executives on that flight.

 Whenever I deliver a short list for a top job to one of my clients, I feel obligated to mention which potential candidates have accepted buyback offers in the past. Often my client will choose not to proceed with one of these people. Remember: Recruiters never forget a buyback, and computer files help us immensely.

 Bosses don’t forget either. Initially, the company that retained you delights in winning you back from the competition. But after perhaps six months, management will begin resenting you for essentially extorting money or power from the firm.

 A bitter taste of disloyalty lingers. Now you’re tacitly expected to perform like a new hire, proving yourself all over again to justify your new salary or position. You had better be up to the task.

 Anytime you use a new job offer as a bargaining chip with your boss, there’s always a risk you’ll lose the bet. Next thing you know, you’re sitting in a strange office, having left a trail of ill will in your wake.

 To be fair, counter-offers can provide an opportunity for employees to voice issues or concerns about their jobs. When you are recruited for another job, ask yourself: What are the pros and cons of my current position? If the negatives outweigh the positives, you simply must leave. However, you may decide you genuinely like your position, aside from one or two problems, in which case it’s time to have an open, honest conversation with your boss–before you accept the offer.

 Down the road, such a conversation will be far more valuable if you choose not to force your boss into a buyback offer. You will retain your reputation for honesty, and, in my experience, this will serves you far better than a single raise or promotion ever could.

 Hal Reiter is chairman and CEO of Herbert Mines Associates, a senior-level executive search firm specializing in the retail, fashion, beauty and consumer products industries.

  • Email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Business networking, Food for thought, HR topics, Managers, Staffing, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 4 Comments

Tips for Job Seekers: be positive, be ready

The best time to look for a new job is while you are still employed. But that is not always possible in a difficult job market, in which layoffs and downsizing are common.

Originally published in The Vancouver Sun January 21, 2009, this article  is still a good beginners primer for those of you thinking about making a job change. Over the coming weeks www.Retailcareers.com Blog will  build on this article and provide you with some common sense, and sometimes not so common  tips on preparing yourself  more fully to ace the job interview!

As always we welcome your questions, and comments at anytime!
Hope you have a great day today!!
Sincerely
 Elaine

 

The best time to look for a new job is while you are still employed. But that is not always possible in a difficult job market, in which layoffs and downsizing are common.

1. Be positive about your abilities and your chances of finding the right job.

2. Know yourself. For instance, if you would find a long commute or the need to travel frequently on business stressful, do not apply for jobs that include such requirements.

3. Know what you want. Identify short- and long-term career goals.

4. Assess your skills. Make sure you are fully qualified for the field you want to be in.

5. Be good at what you do and take pride in your work at any level.

6. Keep your resume current and customize it for each job application. One size does not fit all, particularly in a tight job market.

Check and recheck your application. One spelling, punctuation or grammatical error and you might be out.

7. Use the KISS principle and the “you” attitude in your application: Keep It Short and Simple. Write any cover letter from the point of view of the employer. Focus on how your skills fit the company, not simply on why you want the job.

8. Incorporate the wording in any careers ad in your application and/or covering letter.

Some career advisers suggest cutting and pasting the entire ad to the end of your resume and turning it into white ink so that it is not visible. In this format, it can still be detected by the computer scanner that checks applications for key words. This ensures that your application passes to the next stage. Applications that do not contain the key words — and they are in the ad somewhere — do not move on.

9. Network. Let friends, former employers, colleagues and other contacts know the kind of job/career you want. Find a mentor. Ask for advice.

10. Be there. Be ready, willing and able for any assignments that improve your skills and expand your contacts.

11. Volunteer. Helping others also helps you. You learn new skills, make new contacts and possibly land a job with the organization that takes you on as a volunteer.

12. Be prepared for job interviews. Make sure you know something about the company and/or position that you are being interviewed for.

Dress smartly and simply. Be especially particular about hygiene. Arrive early, so you have time for last-minute grooming and perhaps a moment to relax before starting the interview. Greet the interviewer(s) with a smile when you enter the room. Stand until invited to sit. Sit straight during the interview. Listen carefully. Answer questions clearly and simply. Thank the interviewers for their time at the end of the session.

13. Be ready for such standard questions as “What is your greatest strength?” and “In which area are you weak?” For strengths, focus on innate aspects of character, e.g. ability to rise to challenges, adaptability, being a team player. For weaknesses, concentrate on things that can be learned, such as improving a second language, learning a new computer program.

14. No one should need to be told this, but be sure that your cellphone or any other beeping device is turned off during an interview.

Remember the old dictum: You have only one chance to make a good first impression.

Remember also that it takes just three seconds for that first impression to register. Once it does, it is virtually irreversible.

  • Email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

June 24 is just another work day for Shelby, Brooklyn and Bella, but this week’s guest Blogger shares some great reasons on why dogs should come to work!

Look to your dog for advice on entrepreneurial success

 Woof! Allow me to introduce myself. I’m Cosmo, Rhonda Abrams‘ dog.

June 24 is Take Your Dog to Work Day, so this week I’m writing her column to encourage others to make plans to allow dogs in their workplaces. Entrepreneurs and small-business owners often lead the way in bringing their dogs — and allowing employees to bring their dogs — to work.

And dogs can help teach small-business owners a thing or two.

Think a canine can’t know much about running a company? Well, lying under Rhonda’s desk, I’ve heard her on the phone. I’ve sat in on meetings. I’ve learned a lot.

 In this office, every day is Take Your Dog to Work Day.

 I’ve been going to work with Rhonda since she adopted me, a white mixed-breed terrier, from a shelter 15 years ago. Through the years, I’ve had many canine office companions, including feisty Ozzy, beloved Nana, and confident Coco.

 Here are the advantages of a dog-friendly office. The policy:

Helps in recruiting talented employees. Rhonda lists “dog-friendly office” in every help-wanted ad.

 That enables her to attract some astonishing people who are delighted to be able to either bring their own dog to the office or just want to work in a friendly atmosphere where dogs are allowed. That’s why you’ll see lots of dogs at some leading companies — like Google and Amazon. 

Helps in retaining employees. Bringing a dog to work is viewed as an incredible perk.

 Once someone can bring their canine companion on the job, it takes a long time before they’ll give that up.

Improves morale. Dogs make almost everyone happier. Getting down on the floor to play with a dog, pet a dog walking by, or just seeing a well-behaved dog across the room lightens the mood.

Makes it easier to stay late. Employees don’t have to worry about rushing home to walk or feed their pet.

Creates connections. Dogs make it easier for employees to connect with one another and to communicate. It gets people up from their desks for doggie breaks from time to time.

Helps save dogs. More people are able to adopt a rescue dog if they are able to bring the dog to work. You can help make that possible.

 Moreover, an entrepreneur can learn a lot about success from a friendly canine. Some of the traits that dogs excel at that can help build your business:

Loyalty. We virtually invented loyalty. If we ran businesses, we’d be loyal to our employees — recognizing that we depend on these people for our success. We also would be loyal to our customers, making sure we really take care of them.

Patience. If dogs were as impatient as humans, we would have given up on our owners a long time ago. People make mistakes; businesses suffer setbacks. In business, you have to learn to take the long view.

Acceptance. Humans put a lot of emphasis on superficial things — how someone looks or the clothes they wear. Dogs look for what’s inside. That’s why people love us.

Perseverance. When I was younger, I could play fetch for hours and hours. It takes persistence to get ahead. Some humans want to get rich quick. That’s not the way it works.

  • Versatility. Dogs make great business companions.

You can talk over your problems and ideas in complete confidence, or take a walk and meet potential customers. Dogs restore your confidence and support you through thick and thin.

Gratitude. How do dogs get humans to do what we want? We let you know when you’ve made us happy.

Canines know humans are suckers for appreciation. Try it. When someone does something that pleases you, let them know; say “thank you.”

Rhonda Abrams is president of The Planning Shop and publisher of books for entrepreneurs. Her newest is the 5th edition of The Successful Business Plan: Secrets and Strategies.

  • Email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Food for thought, General Info, HR topics, Managers, Recruiter, Staffing | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Copper needs a good home – do you know of a goodhearted person who can handle some unconditional love??

 

www.youtube.com

http://www.GSRBC.com/ – “Copper” is a young adult German Shepherd dog that came to German Shepherd Rescue of BC via a local animal shelter. Copper is a purebred dog, registered, and is neutured. This video was taken June 5, 2011. For more information about Copper please visit the GSRBC website.

 

Hi Friends -  as you know Brooklyn is our Assistant D.O.G at the office -  what you might not know is that she is a special needs dog, who we adopted  from the GSRBC almost 4 years ago. They saved her saved her mum who was a terribly abused 8 month old black lab who was pregnant with 8 pups . This small group of people have done amazing things with almost nothing but the determination to help dogs that can’t help themselves. I KNOW there are so many organizations needing help out there, and I bet you are all helping someone some how, BUT -  if you have a few dollars to spare as a donation or, even better for you -  if you could purchase some of their raffle tickets (see the fundraiser) -  they are in VERY dire straights at the moment. They are a registered charity, so you can get a tax receipt for a monetary donation.  Please let me know if you can help me help them. I will be lending my assistance to them over the next while to help them over this tough patch and get them to the next level of organization so that they can continue to focus on helping these poor abused animals become well and find loving homes. Please  click on the Ipad raffle page and scroll down to the video and try  to watch it. I warn you it’s heartbreaking, and these volunteers who deal with it almost daily devote a big portion of their lives and their personal income to helping them.  So if you can see your way to forgoing  a couple of lattes this week  and donate the money to the GSRBC, I will promise you that it will be put to very good use!!

Sincerely, Elaine

  • Email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Business networking, Food for thought, GSRBC, General Info | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

You have to kiss a lot of Toads to find your Prince!

 (or…With Job boards and Social media who needs recruiters anymore anyway?)

 With the worst of the recession behind us, the need to fill vacant staff openings is becoming more urgent.  Here are some examples of things we are hearing…

 “We made do with our smaller staff complement over the past months, but now things are starting to pick up again, and we are really feeling stretched. And vacation time is coming soon!”  Sound familiar?

Here’s what the boss says: “Well, that’s no problem, we have learned about social media and job boards over the past year, we’ll just post ads and see what we get – surely lots of people will apply; we can do this ourselves and it won’t cost us anything!” Right?   Maybe – or maybe not.

 Aside from the time, expertise and internal costs it takes to conduct a hiring process this way, if your experience with recruiters has only been with those who post ads and scour the job boards and social media for talent, you may be right

 With employers and many recruiters all competing for the same pool of public-domain candidates, it’s no wonder so many managers and owners feel that recruiting can be a DYI project.

“Ok -  so let’s call some recruiters and see who they submit – they can bring us names, and we can check them against our own list. “ Another practice becoming more frequent over the past couple of years…The internet and social media certainly allows anyone to create data bases of names with ease these days.  But a name on a list is just a name.

 By definition, the purpose of delegating the recruiting function to a third party is to gain their assistance – not enter into a competition with them.  A good recruiter is someone who solves your hiring challenge quickly, satisfactorily and most cost effectively through their knowledge of your industry and because of the actual relationships they have nurtured  over time with suitable candidates that you won’t attract through your ads.

 I prefer to be called a professional Career Matchmaker, as we work as closely with our candidates to match them to their career aspirations as we do with our client companies. Those relationships grow over time regardless of the position they are currently in, and we assist  and advise them in achieving their career goals and aspirations.

  Don’t get me wrong, there are some very effective in-house recruiters across Canada that do a great job of seeking out talent. Their scope has a natural limitation compared to an independent recruiter however, because they only have one option for the candidate -  their company – so they can only attract a certain pool of talent already interested in their company brand. They can never throw out a wide enough net to attract as much high quality talent as a good independent recruiter can.

 Because there is so much more to recruiting top talent than finding a resume on the internet (or any where else for that matter!), a good Career Matchmaker brings their considerable insight, impartiality, and knowledge of the total industry to their relationship with each candidate, creating a confidential trust with and because they represent many companies, a “one stop shop” so to speak for their candidates.

 Just like in the dating world, an introduction of such a candidate presented by their Career Matchmaker has much better odds of being a perfect match for your company than a blind date off the internet.  So, how many toads do you want to kiss??

  • Email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Business networking, Food for thought, General Info, HR topics, Managers, Networking, Recruiter, Retail sales, Staffing, social media | Leave a comment

Temp Talk Blog

By guest Blogger, Michelle Mattinson, Manager of the Temporary Staffing division of Campbell, Edgar Inc. Michelle@retailtemps.ca

 I recently posted a temporary forklift position and within four days I got over 100 submittals. Ugggggh.

Unfortunately, here is a look into what I saw: typos and misspellings on resumes; zero mention of accountability; inconsistent information; absent information from previous jobs; half-completed resumes; and six out of seven resumes were from forklift driver  wannabes. The sad part is that some of the wannabes took more time to position themselves than some of the veterans.

If you are serious about landing a job, and you want to separate your candidacy from the sea of competition, I suggest you take your job search seriously, even if it is for a temporary position. Take your time. Who you are being in your job search is a reflection of who you will be on the job.

Read the ad or job posting in full. If specific requirements such as certifications are requested, and you don’t have them, don’t apply for that position!

And when we schedule you in for an interview – show up! Apart from it being just plain rude to stand up a confirmed appointment with someone; it speaks volumes about you. What do you suppose the chances are that we will entertain an application from you ever again? (Answer – NONE!)

When we ask you questions, answer the questions concisely and accurately; in our business, time is money. If there are instructions to follow on our testing and with our client, don’t demonstrate what a rogue you are. On the other hand, if you follow the instructions verbatim and don’t do anything above and beyond — like using some creativity in your communication or application — you may be sending a message that you give just what is asked and nothing more.

Perfect example is just attaching your resume to an email with no covering note. Way to sell yourself!

Another tip: If you are applying for a job with me, look us up, find us on Google, Face book, LinkedIn, and talk to us professionally.  Don’t address me by Dear Sirs when my name is Michelle. When we get resumes like that, we almost always bin them immediately. I have never met a ‘Sir’ named Michelle. And it tells me you don’t care.

These days the screening process for hiring has lots of steps, as there is more employer risks involved. If you don’t follow the application instructions accurately, you are sending a message that you can’t assimilate to the employer’s ways of doing things.

And -  while I’m raving…when we both agree to schedule you out for a work assignment– and then you choose not to show up –  with no advance notice given to us and smearing our reputation with our client in the process -   well, you can imagine how we feel about you then??  (it’s unprintable)! 

Regardless of what your employment experience is, job searching is a sales process. You are selling me on why I should invest in you.  That takes positioning, discernment, listening, questioning/probing, and salesmanship.

Remember, how you act in conducting your job search is an indicator of how you will function in a job for others. This seems straightforward logic; however, I think that sometimes people catch a case of running on automatic, or feeling like sending out job application is just a numbers game. Perhaps you are thinking that the more I send out the better chance I have of finding work.  Quantity over quality.  Well, you reap what you sow!!

If you think of the process of finding work as a game, then winning the game means you get work. Losing the game means you get to keep on looking. Next time you respond to a staffing agency call out -  take a moment before you press the send button and think about this -  am I presenting myself in the best light for this position? Am I sending this application with the same amount of respect that I want in return?

  • Email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Networking, Staffing, Temp Talk, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments